Leadership is so personal and so individual that learning from a “great leader” is like trying to copy Tiger Woods clothing choices
to improve one’s golf game. We can’t clothe ourselves with someone else’s techniques. An author I once read thought that if he just practiced tennis a little harder each day he could get to the pro level. In a word, he said he was filled with arrogance. Leaders who think they can lead like John Maxwell to get recognition as a “pro” level leader can be summed up in one word: arrogant.
When trying to lead cats, aka leading church people, Maxwell seems to do well. On one face he’s all about the leader growing, getting organized, and discerning right times, actions, and influential people. On the other face, he proposes techniques to control who is in control, who is delegated the important tasks, and which charted course one should follow. I believe that he needs to be read, but others can flesh out his two faces with a complete body.
Michael Hyatt wrote last week in his blog that the single most important trait of a leader is the ability to make decisions. Unfortunately, Maxwell would modify that: people follow leaders who make the right decision 80% of the time.
Peter Drucker has taught management courses for sixty years. He says the best leaders don’t use techniques or control to get people to follow. The best leaders can see the future, can step outside of their organizations to see it objectively, and can cut off people, activities, and even entire divisions or companies because they have the most powerful trait of a leader: they always operate with the end in mind (which BTW, is one of Steven Covey’s Seven Habits of Highly Successful People). Leaders have purpose and drive to get to their objective. Drucker says in business the objective is always easier to see. The objective is the bottom line. For non-profits, the objective is serving without the bottom line in mind first.
How successful was Jesus at leading? He chose the wrong followers. He set death as his objective not profits. He ostracized the people who had the greatest influence in society. He let the big fish get away (centurions, Nicodemus, Pilate, etc.). He spent way too much time with odd ducks, the powerless, and the diseased. He didn’t leave any great plans to change society, didn’t have planning meetings, and didn’t leave a prayer book behind.
However, he taught people to love God and others. He acted in love all the time. People saw raw, pure love. He let people be people. He let them enjoy their time with him at countless meals and banquets. Christian leaders ought to wake up and put love back at the top of their to-do lists instead of learning great techniques and making great plans. I think we’d make a more lasting impact since no other business model has that as their primary purpose!
“A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another. By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.” ( John 13:34-35)
‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ “This is the great and foremost commandment. “And a second is like it, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.” ( Matthew 22:37-40)
Related articles
- Why Peter Drucker Distrusted Facts – Stephen Wunker – Harvard Business Review (amvaishnav.wordpress.com)
- Jesus’ Key Message from Jesus Central
- 100 Years of Drucker (prweb.com)
- The 360° Leader – John Maxwell Book Review (diakrinomusings.wordpress.com)
Related articles
- 100 Years of Drucker (prweb.com)
- The 360° Leader – John Maxwell Book Review (diakrinomusings.wordpress.com)

